NEW AUDIO WILL BE UP VERY SOON!

They Do Not Always Choose Children, It Could Be You Someday!

The State’s in this country do not only seize children, they can take action against you or your parents, grandparents or whom ever they feel in “need of services” no matter if you wish to utilize them or not. Look at this poor woman, having them in her life to the point she has been harassed so much that at 90 she wishes she would just die. People need to stand up NOW against our Social Services Systems in this Country. Do not wait till it is you at 90 or one of your parents to start your bitching and wineing. COMPLAINE NOW, or lose your right to latter.

Missouri Governor Jay Nixon Relies On Unborn To Pay His Debt

Another PERFECT example of the fact that Missouri Governor Jay Nixon does not give a CRAP about the State future or Missouri Children, to the point from the time they come from the womb there in expected to be in debt, hell hes relying on children not even born yet. But of course many know of his puppy mill tactics to feed the Missouri machine.
All Because he lacks the ability to properly manage and maintain the States budget. Perhaps if he was not gallivanting and playboying all over the country going to sporting events, where the State is paying for security for his pompa’s-ass! It could alleviate some of that debt he wants to pass on.
I recall not to long ago there was some misuse of funds issues that Mr. Nixon had to pay back. Hey Nixon why don’t you look closer to home and cut the fat! I can list NUMEROUS State workers that serve NO purpose, why not dislodge them from your monarchy and save the children and there grandchildren the burden of your errors and inability, oh noble king. Numerous times your own workers have stated that you lack the ability to properly handle issues with in the State. And it seems from your own statement that is true.

A Missouri DFS Xmas

Well with the Holiday season upon us, this is a PRIME example of what DFS is and how families are treated to feed the puppy mill, the sick bastards have even turned Santa Clause to there dark cause. Is anything sacred?

A VERY Enlightening article wrote by, Barbra Hollingsworth of the Examiner

Is it child protection or legal kidnapping?

"Children being taken from their homes, based on tips from anonymous telephone callers alleging abuse or neglect, has been cast in a harsh spotlight in the Texas polygamy case, and there’s growing evidence that more than a few of the 510,000 children placed in foster care annually don’t belong there.
In February, Georgia state Sen. Nancy Schaefer released a blistering assessment of the bureaucrats entrusted to protect children there: “I believe Child Protective Services (CPS) nationwide has become corrupt and that the entire system is broken almost beyond repair. I am convinced parents and families should be warned of the dangers.”
Armed with court orders and protected by confidentiality statutes that function as bureaucratic shield laws, CPS workers need just one anonymous phone call to a hotline to swoop in and remove children, regardless of the facts.
Such calls can be legitimate, coming from a legally mandated reporter such as a doctor or teacher. But it could also be a fabrication from a vindictive ex-spouse, a nosy neighbor, or a disgruntled relative.
Since no laws clearly define child abuse and neglect, parents have been accused of these serious crimes when what they actually did was yell, withhold TV privileges, or “repressing” their children by supervising them too much.
Dr. Steven Krason, professor of political science and legal studies at Franciscan University of Steubenville, is writing a book on CPS wrongdoing based on two decades of research.
Krason says CPS itself now poses “a grave threat” because “it is almost impossible to fully insulate one’s family from...a system that on very little pretense can simply reach into the home and take away one’s offspring.”
He’s convinced the number of real child abuse cases has remained fairly steady over the last three decades; what has been growing is an unprecedented government assault on innocent parents.
And if it doesn’t take much to have your children placed in foster care, getting them back can be another story. An anonymous call about a 10-ounce weight loss by their then 3-week-old daughter triggered a legal avalanche that buried Arlington residents Nancy Hey and Christopher Slitor.
Their parental rights were terminated last year by Arlington Judge James Almand even though Hey and Slitor had been exonerated by of all neglect charges nine months earlier.
In another local case, Georgetown residents Greg and Juliana Caplan had to spend $75,000 on lawyers and wait two weeks before their children were returned, even after five doctors confirmed that an injury sustained by one of their twin daughters was not caused by abuse.
The Caplans are still listed as possible child abusers in D.C., however, because they refused to submit to psychological counseling. Despite the stigma, that might have been a wise decision.
The psychological evaluation trap is one of the least expected obstacles facing parents snared unfairly in the CPS system. Most panicked parents promise to do anything to get their children back, often agreeing to a battery of psychological tests they naively believe will prove their parental competence and end the nightmare. But it doesn’t always work out that way.
Arlington social workers told Hey that she had to undergo psychological testing before she could get her baby back, so the longtime Federal Communications Commission employee readily agreed.
She was diagnosed with two clinical disorders by Dr. Giselle Hass at the Multicultural Clinical Center in Springfield. This psychological evaluation was cited in the court ruling terminating Hey’s parental rights.
But an independent, expert analysis of the report obtained by The Examiner included scathing critique of the methodology used to evaluate Hey, saying it “...reads more like advocacy than a professional psychological assessment... clear and frequent evidence of error... Any graduate student who turned in as poorly scored and interpreted a test as did this evaluator would probably have failed the first semester.”
Besides violations of standard practice and professional rules of ethics, the analysis noted numerous illustrations of bias in the psychological profile and “a consistent failure to include data that would be favorable to Mrs. Hey,”including 17 computer-generated scores on the Parental Stress Index that were all in the normal range.
This was a significant omission, given that Judge Almand cited Hey’s tendency of “freezing...in times of stress” as one of the main reasons she could not be trusted to raise her own child.
Hey – who has never been convicted of either abuse or neglect – has had no contact with three-year-old Sabrina since Judge Almand allowed her to be adopted by the same foster family Arlington CPS workers originally selected to care for her baby.

Barbara F. Hollingsworth is The Examiner’s local opinion editor. "

A Look Inside a Judges Bathroom

We have all heard of Judges doing this but never seen it before, kinda like Bigfoot. You hear about it but no proof. Guess it is true they really do wipe their asses with the Constitution!!!!