One year ago today Missouri Department of Children’s Social Service worker Regina Susan Kerwood departed this earth on a fast moving train straight to hell.
In doing so she left behind many families she ruined as well as numerous that she did not make it to be for dropping dead at 58. Ms. Kerwood was well known for her incompetence, lying and inconsistent stories and falsification of statements.
As well she had a very perverse and strong interest in “sexual devices”. Her and Deputy Pam Miller of the Barton County Sheriffs Department were known to force females to disrobe in there presence for there own sexual gratification.
There is a special place in hell reserved for social workers in general and this one has a front row seat to be the devils concubine. The world is a much better place with out her, and oddly enough she was planted on February 14th 2009 Valentines Day as well OUR anniversary. Kudos we have many more reasons to celebrate.
Showing posts with label Missouri Childrens Division. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Missouri Childrens Division. Show all posts
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
Monday, February 8, 2010
When A Person Cant Keep There Own Family Together, Get A Job Destroying Others!
While looking threw DFS file we came across a VERY odd statement made by DSS Worker David Capps to another State employee Marisa Maples this conversation was discussing them needing our marriage date and our {DIVORCE DATE} that’s odd, were not divorced and there is no plans to due so.
It then dawned on us and a bit of research reviled that Mr. Capps is a divorcee. It would seem, that due to the fact that he could not hold his marriage together then he expects everyone else to sercum to the pressure. Would be curious what the irreconcilable difference was that caused his marriage to terminate.
Makes you wonder if he took his job at DSS with the soul purpose of destroying families and relationships. It is obvious from his and Ms. Maples conversation is that it is the State’s intent to disrupt the sanctity of marriage threw harassment and intimidation. As they made the assumption that we had been divorced after the onslaught perpetrated by DSS workers and the State. That has hard as they tried, did not work! We will be celebrating our 18th wedding anniversary on February 14th of this year. And it would seem someone has a jealous streak and a malicious nature that they could not hold there’s together while we have perfect balance in our relationship.
It then dawned on us and a bit of research reviled that Mr. Capps is a divorcee. It would seem, that due to the fact that he could not hold his marriage together then he expects everyone else to sercum to the pressure. Would be curious what the irreconcilable difference was that caused his marriage to terminate.
Makes you wonder if he took his job at DSS with the soul purpose of destroying families and relationships. It is obvious from his and Ms. Maples conversation is that it is the State’s intent to disrupt the sanctity of marriage threw harassment and intimidation. As they made the assumption that we had been divorced after the onslaught perpetrated by DSS workers and the State. That has hard as they tried, did not work! We will be celebrating our 18th wedding anniversary on February 14th of this year. And it would seem someone has a jealous streak and a malicious nature that they could not hold there’s together while we have perfect balance in our relationship.
Sunday, January 24, 2010
Social Worker Wants a 3-Way.
In a conversation with David Capps of the Missouri 5th Circuit Children’s Division to another co-worker he stated “I will definitely be calling Mr. and Mrs.” [C] “If I am able to do a three way”
WOW, how interesting, sorry to say Mr. Capps we would not be interested in that besides from the file it would appear your to busy dating our now 15 year old daughter.
WOW, how interesting, sorry to say Mr. Capps we would not be interested in that besides from the file it would appear your to busy dating our now 15 year old daughter.
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
Friday, November 20, 2009
A Missouri DFS Xmas
Well with the Holiday season upon us, this is a PRIME example of what DFS is and how families are treated to feed the puppy mill, the sick bastards have even turned Santa Clause to there dark cause. Is anything sacred?
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
A VERY Enlightening article wrote by, Barbra Hollingsworth of the Examiner
Is it child protection or legal kidnapping?
"Children being taken from their homes, based on tips from anonymous telephone callers alleging abuse or neglect, has been cast in a harsh spotlight in the Texas polygamy case, and there’s growing evidence that more than a few of the 510,000 children placed in foster care annually don’t belong there.
In February, Georgia state Sen. Nancy Schaefer released a blistering assessment of the bureaucrats entrusted to protect children there: “I believe Child Protective Services (CPS) nationwide has become corrupt and that the entire system is broken almost beyond repair. I am convinced parents and families should be warned of the dangers.”
Armed with court orders and protected by confidentiality statutes that function as bureaucratic shield laws, CPS workers need just one anonymous phone call to a hotline to swoop in and remove children, regardless of the facts.
Such calls can be legitimate, coming from a legally mandated reporter such as a doctor or teacher. But it could also be a fabrication from a vindictive ex-spouse, a nosy neighbor, or a disgruntled relative.
Since no laws clearly define child abuse and neglect, parents have been accused of these serious crimes when what they actually did was yell, withhold TV privileges, or “repressing” their children by supervising them too much.
Dr. Steven Krason, professor of political science and legal studies at Franciscan University of Steubenville, is writing a book on CPS wrongdoing based on two decades of research.
Krason says CPS itself now poses “a grave threat” because “it is almost impossible to fully insulate one’s family from...a system that on very little pretense can simply reach into the home and take away one’s offspring.”
He’s convinced the number of real child abuse cases has remained fairly steady over the last three decades; what has been growing is an unprecedented government assault on innocent parents.
And if it doesn’t take much to have your children placed in foster care, getting them back can be another story. An anonymous call about a 10-ounce weight loss by their then 3-week-old daughter triggered a legal avalanche that buried Arlington residents Nancy Hey and Christopher Slitor.
Their parental rights were terminated last year by Arlington Judge James Almand even though Hey and Slitor had been exonerated by of all neglect charges nine months earlier.
In another local case, Georgetown residents Greg and Juliana Caplan had to spend $75,000 on lawyers and wait two weeks before their children were returned, even after five doctors confirmed that an injury sustained by one of their twin daughters was not caused by abuse.
The Caplans are still listed as possible child abusers in D.C., however, because they refused to submit to psychological counseling. Despite the stigma, that might have been a wise decision.
The psychological evaluation trap is one of the least expected obstacles facing parents snared unfairly in the CPS system. Most panicked parents promise to do anything to get their children back, often agreeing to a battery of psychological tests they naively believe will prove their parental competence and end the nightmare. But it doesn’t always work out that way.
Arlington social workers told Hey that she had to undergo psychological testing before she could get her baby back, so the longtime Federal Communications Commission employee readily agreed.
She was diagnosed with two clinical disorders by Dr. Giselle Hass at the Multicultural Clinical Center in Springfield. This psychological evaluation was cited in the court ruling terminating Hey’s parental rights.
But an independent, expert analysis of the report obtained by The Examiner included scathing critique of the methodology used to evaluate Hey, saying it “...reads more like advocacy than a professional psychological assessment... clear and frequent evidence of error... Any graduate student who turned in as poorly scored and interpreted a test as did this evaluator would probably have failed the first semester.”
Besides violations of standard practice and professional rules of ethics, the analysis noted numerous illustrations of bias in the psychological profile and “a consistent failure to include data that would be favorable to Mrs. Hey,”including 17 computer-generated scores on the Parental Stress Index that were all in the normal range.
This was a significant omission, given that Judge Almand cited Hey’s tendency of “freezing...in times of stress” as one of the main reasons she could not be trusted to raise her own child.
Hey – who has never been convicted of either abuse or neglect – has had no contact with three-year-old Sabrina since Judge Almand allowed her to be adopted by the same foster family Arlington CPS workers originally selected to care for her baby.
Barbara F. Hollingsworth is The Examiner’s local opinion editor. "
"Children being taken from their homes, based on tips from anonymous telephone callers alleging abuse or neglect, has been cast in a harsh spotlight in the Texas polygamy case, and there’s growing evidence that more than a few of the 510,000 children placed in foster care annually don’t belong there.
In February, Georgia state Sen. Nancy Schaefer released a blistering assessment of the bureaucrats entrusted to protect children there: “I believe Child Protective Services (CPS) nationwide has become corrupt and that the entire system is broken almost beyond repair. I am convinced parents and families should be warned of the dangers.”
Armed with court orders and protected by confidentiality statutes that function as bureaucratic shield laws, CPS workers need just one anonymous phone call to a hotline to swoop in and remove children, regardless of the facts.
Such calls can be legitimate, coming from a legally mandated reporter such as a doctor or teacher. But it could also be a fabrication from a vindictive ex-spouse, a nosy neighbor, or a disgruntled relative.
Since no laws clearly define child abuse and neglect, parents have been accused of these serious crimes when what they actually did was yell, withhold TV privileges, or “repressing” their children by supervising them too much.
Dr. Steven Krason, professor of political science and legal studies at Franciscan University of Steubenville, is writing a book on CPS wrongdoing based on two decades of research.
Krason says CPS itself now poses “a grave threat” because “it is almost impossible to fully insulate one’s family from...a system that on very little pretense can simply reach into the home and take away one’s offspring.”
He’s convinced the number of real child abuse cases has remained fairly steady over the last three decades; what has been growing is an unprecedented government assault on innocent parents.
And if it doesn’t take much to have your children placed in foster care, getting them back can be another story. An anonymous call about a 10-ounce weight loss by their then 3-week-old daughter triggered a legal avalanche that buried Arlington residents Nancy Hey and Christopher Slitor.
Their parental rights were terminated last year by Arlington Judge James Almand even though Hey and Slitor had been exonerated by of all neglect charges nine months earlier.
In another local case, Georgetown residents Greg and Juliana Caplan had to spend $75,000 on lawyers and wait two weeks before their children were returned, even after five doctors confirmed that an injury sustained by one of their twin daughters was not caused by abuse.
The Caplans are still listed as possible child abusers in D.C., however, because they refused to submit to psychological counseling. Despite the stigma, that might have been a wise decision.
The psychological evaluation trap is one of the least expected obstacles facing parents snared unfairly in the CPS system. Most panicked parents promise to do anything to get their children back, often agreeing to a battery of psychological tests they naively believe will prove their parental competence and end the nightmare. But it doesn’t always work out that way.
Arlington social workers told Hey that she had to undergo psychological testing before she could get her baby back, so the longtime Federal Communications Commission employee readily agreed.
She was diagnosed with two clinical disorders by Dr. Giselle Hass at the Multicultural Clinical Center in Springfield. This psychological evaluation was cited in the court ruling terminating Hey’s parental rights.
But an independent, expert analysis of the report obtained by The Examiner included scathing critique of the methodology used to evaluate Hey, saying it “...reads more like advocacy than a professional psychological assessment... clear and frequent evidence of error... Any graduate student who turned in as poorly scored and interpreted a test as did this evaluator would probably have failed the first semester.”
Besides violations of standard practice and professional rules of ethics, the analysis noted numerous illustrations of bias in the psychological profile and “a consistent failure to include data that would be favorable to Mrs. Hey,”including 17 computer-generated scores on the Parental Stress Index that were all in the normal range.
This was a significant omission, given that Judge Almand cited Hey’s tendency of “freezing...in times of stress” as one of the main reasons she could not be trusted to raise her own child.
Hey – who has never been convicted of either abuse or neglect – has had no contact with three-year-old Sabrina since Judge Almand allowed her to be adopted by the same foster family Arlington CPS workers originally selected to care for her baby.
Barbara F. Hollingsworth is The Examiner’s local opinion editor. "
Saturday, October 17, 2009
This Video Confronts If CPS/DFS Hates Kids
The answer is NO they do not hate them they love them like a tapeworm loves its host. The problem is they do not care about them there is a difference, you would think that a child dieing in custody is a bad thing, but not to a system funded on a trickle effect. To a State economy a dead kid is just as lucrative as a live one, an abused kid in foster care is better than one at home with there parents safe and sound.
WHY? Think about it, the State receives funds when the child goes in to care. From there they can tap the piggy bank for numerous other things treatment, drugs, evaluation etc. Now if the child GETS abused in foster care, there again are evaluations, drugs, etc as well now possible criminal charges for the abuser.
Then there’s a death, just as good as the above, because now there is coroners inquests, charges, extra hours for law enforcement, the division, etc. And don’t forget the news crews! NEWS CREWS! You say.. Well that’s a bad thing, isn’t it all that publicity.. No that’s the best, then your politician can use it to catapult themselves, they can lobby for more funds to correct there systems. And all those news crews bring revenue with them, to the dinners, coffee shops etc. in the form of taxes. On top of that, it sells news papers and TV ads. With Missouri eliminating income tax and going to a point of sale tax, should aid in generating funds for the State.
So this video address CPS/DFS love or hate for children, and I say they LOVE them to DEATH!!!!
WHY? Think about it, the State receives funds when the child goes in to care. From there they can tap the piggy bank for numerous other things treatment, drugs, evaluation etc. Now if the child GETS abused in foster care, there again are evaluations, drugs, etc as well now possible criminal charges for the abuser.
Then there’s a death, just as good as the above, because now there is coroners inquests, charges, extra hours for law enforcement, the division, etc. And don’t forget the news crews! NEWS CREWS! You say.. Well that’s a bad thing, isn’t it all that publicity.. No that’s the best, then your politician can use it to catapult themselves, they can lobby for more funds to correct there systems. And all those news crews bring revenue with them, to the dinners, coffee shops etc. in the form of taxes. On top of that, it sells news papers and TV ads. With Missouri eliminating income tax and going to a point of sale tax, should aid in generating funds for the State.
So this video address CPS/DFS love or hate for children, and I say they LOVE them to DEATH!!!!
Friday, October 16, 2009
Organization is the nail in your coffin and we are the hammer!
Very interesting video and a very sad one, but a MUST SEE to understand the monster that the Social Service system is. This woman gave up because they beat her into submission, we will tell you this you Sons of Bitches!!! You will NOT beat us down, we will fight you everyday, expose you everyday and pick up the fight for people like this. You have all leaped in to a political nightmare, against a force you should not have reckoned with and we see stories like this similar to what we are living only outrages us more.
The problem is all these sad sob stories on the net all these people with a story to tell but no outlet and most important organization.
And organization is the nail in your coffin and we are the hammer. We can organize, we are not shy and we do not fear conflict or the media, not like you and your careers. So set back and enjoy the ride, watch as one by one people across the land people join hands in a common goal and march on congress by phone by fax and in person to stop the puppy mill the States have created and stall your federal funds.
The way to change DFS/CPS and hold a State at the publics mercy, is to seize the purse!
The problem is all these sad sob stories on the net all these people with a story to tell but no outlet and most important organization.
And organization is the nail in your coffin and we are the hammer. We can organize, we are not shy and we do not fear conflict or the media, not like you and your careers. So set back and enjoy the ride, watch as one by one people across the land people join hands in a common goal and march on congress by phone by fax and in person to stop the puppy mill the States have created and stall your federal funds.
The way to change DFS/CPS and hold a State at the publics mercy, is to seize the purse!
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
CPS/DFS Are FULL of VERY underhanded people, see for yourself.
Well we have stated that CPS/DFS are full of some VERY underhanded people. Well judge for your self in this short clip we FOUND and had nothing to due with it creation
Monday, October 12, 2009
2nd Time By The State of Missouri is Reckless Incompetence, As A Hot Line Caller Your Identity is NOT Protected!
This is the second time that the State of Missouri has released the identity of a hotline caller it the States Narrative Report, as in this document that has been edited an only pertinent information displayed. It clearly states that in 1995 Janie Thomas placed a Hot Line call to Missouri DFS. Again a criminal act for the State of Missouri to release this information, but they have done so. Governor Nixon, Lt. Governor Kinder, Social Services Director Ron Levy as well other parties have been contact in-regards to this and we are awaiting there response.
Something for the public to ponder, you are information and identity is NOT confidential, nor is what you say in the call, as was removed from this document. Keep that in mind when you pick up the phone to make a false or legitimate report of abuse/neglect that you yourself may be held accountable for your actions.
Something for the public to ponder, you are information and identity is NOT confidential, nor is what you say in the call, as was removed from this document. Keep that in mind when you pick up the phone to make a false or legitimate report of abuse/neglect that you yourself may be held accountable for your actions.
Before You Hotline A Call Know Your Identity Is NOT Confidential In Missouri
Even though Missouri Law mandates that a party making a Hotline Call to the State shall be kept confidential, it is obviously NOT as obtained in this document from the 5th Circuit Missouri Children’s Division as it CLEARLY States in there records that Mrs. Cheryl Fountain was the Hotline Caller. It is mandatory this information is removed and was not and is a crime that it was not. Well maybe just a simple error but the 28th Circuit Children’s Division released the same information. And the 5th Circuit released another parties name, that we have documentation of that she made a previous Hot Line call. That will be presented in a separate story.
So the next time you go to pick up the phone to report Child Abuse whether legitimate or false, take in to consideration that your identity WILL be released to the accused/alleged perpetrator and that you are not protected and could face civil ramifications for your actions.
And for the State of Missouri to promise this protection to its citizens and then not follow through shows the reckless disregard by the executive branch and its legislature. As Governor Jay Nixon, Lt. Governor Peter Kinder Department of Social Services Director Ronald Levy have all been contacted in-regards to this, and no response at this time.
So the next time you go to pick up the phone to report Child Abuse whether legitimate or false, take in to consideration that your identity WILL be released to the accused/alleged perpetrator and that you are not protected and could face civil ramifications for your actions.
And for the State of Missouri to promise this protection to its citizens and then not follow through shows the reckless disregard by the executive branch and its legislature. As Governor Jay Nixon, Lt. Governor Peter Kinder Department of Social Services Director Ronald Levy have all been contacted in-regards to this, and no response at this time.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
