While looking threw DFS file we came across a VERY odd statement made by DSS Worker David Capps to another State employee Marisa Maples this conversation was discussing them needing our marriage date and our {DIVORCE DATE} that’s odd, were not divorced and there is no plans to due so.
It then dawned on us and a bit of research reviled that Mr. Capps is a divorcee. It would seem, that due to the fact that he could not hold his marriage together then he expects everyone else to sercum to the pressure. Would be curious what the irreconcilable difference was that caused his marriage to terminate.
Makes you wonder if he took his job at DSS with the soul purpose of destroying families and relationships. It is obvious from his and Ms. Maples conversation is that it is the State’s intent to disrupt the sanctity of marriage threw harassment and intimidation. As they made the assumption that we had been divorced after the onslaught perpetrated by DSS workers and the State. That has hard as they tried, did not work! We will be celebrating our 18th wedding anniversary on February 14th of this year. And it would seem someone has a jealous streak and a malicious nature that they could not hold there’s together while we have perfect balance in our relationship.
Showing posts with label DFS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DFS. Show all posts
Monday, February 8, 2010
Sunday, January 24, 2010
Social Worker Wants a 3-Way.
In a conversation with David Capps of the Missouri 5th Circuit Children’s Division to another co-worker he stated “I will definitely be calling Mr. and Mrs.” [C] “If I am able to do a three way”
WOW, how interesting, sorry to say Mr. Capps we would not be interested in that besides from the file it would appear your to busy dating our now 15 year old daughter.
WOW, how interesting, sorry to say Mr. Capps we would not be interested in that besides from the file it would appear your to busy dating our now 15 year old daughter.
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
They Do Not Always Choose Children, It Could Be You Someday!
The State’s in this country do not only seize children, they can take action against you or your parents, grandparents or whom ever they feel in “need of services” no matter if you wish to utilize them or not. Look at this poor woman, having them in her life to the point she has been harassed so much that at 90 she wishes she would just die. People need to stand up NOW against our Social Services Systems in this Country. Do not wait till it is you at 90 or one of your parents to start your bitching and wineing. COMPLAINE NOW, or lose your right to latter.
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
A VERY Enlightening article wrote by, Barbra Hollingsworth of the Examiner
Is it child protection or legal kidnapping?
"Children being taken from their homes, based on tips from anonymous telephone callers alleging abuse or neglect, has been cast in a harsh spotlight in the Texas polygamy case, and there’s growing evidence that more than a few of the 510,000 children placed in foster care annually don’t belong there.
In February, Georgia state Sen. Nancy Schaefer released a blistering assessment of the bureaucrats entrusted to protect children there: “I believe Child Protective Services (CPS) nationwide has become corrupt and that the entire system is broken almost beyond repair. I am convinced parents and families should be warned of the dangers.”
Armed with court orders and protected by confidentiality statutes that function as bureaucratic shield laws, CPS workers need just one anonymous phone call to a hotline to swoop in and remove children, regardless of the facts.
Such calls can be legitimate, coming from a legally mandated reporter such as a doctor or teacher. But it could also be a fabrication from a vindictive ex-spouse, a nosy neighbor, or a disgruntled relative.
Since no laws clearly define child abuse and neglect, parents have been accused of these serious crimes when what they actually did was yell, withhold TV privileges, or “repressing” their children by supervising them too much.
Dr. Steven Krason, professor of political science and legal studies at Franciscan University of Steubenville, is writing a book on CPS wrongdoing based on two decades of research.
Krason says CPS itself now poses “a grave threat” because “it is almost impossible to fully insulate one’s family from...a system that on very little pretense can simply reach into the home and take away one’s offspring.”
He’s convinced the number of real child abuse cases has remained fairly steady over the last three decades; what has been growing is an unprecedented government assault on innocent parents.
And if it doesn’t take much to have your children placed in foster care, getting them back can be another story. An anonymous call about a 10-ounce weight loss by their then 3-week-old daughter triggered a legal avalanche that buried Arlington residents Nancy Hey and Christopher Slitor.
Their parental rights were terminated last year by Arlington Judge James Almand even though Hey and Slitor had been exonerated by of all neglect charges nine months earlier.
In another local case, Georgetown residents Greg and Juliana Caplan had to spend $75,000 on lawyers and wait two weeks before their children were returned, even after five doctors confirmed that an injury sustained by one of their twin daughters was not caused by abuse.
The Caplans are still listed as possible child abusers in D.C., however, because they refused to submit to psychological counseling. Despite the stigma, that might have been a wise decision.
The psychological evaluation trap is one of the least expected obstacles facing parents snared unfairly in the CPS system. Most panicked parents promise to do anything to get their children back, often agreeing to a battery of psychological tests they naively believe will prove their parental competence and end the nightmare. But it doesn’t always work out that way.
Arlington social workers told Hey that she had to undergo psychological testing before she could get her baby back, so the longtime Federal Communications Commission employee readily agreed.
She was diagnosed with two clinical disorders by Dr. Giselle Hass at the Multicultural Clinical Center in Springfield. This psychological evaluation was cited in the court ruling terminating Hey’s parental rights.
But an independent, expert analysis of the report obtained by The Examiner included scathing critique of the methodology used to evaluate Hey, saying it “...reads more like advocacy than a professional psychological assessment... clear and frequent evidence of error... Any graduate student who turned in as poorly scored and interpreted a test as did this evaluator would probably have failed the first semester.”
Besides violations of standard practice and professional rules of ethics, the analysis noted numerous illustrations of bias in the psychological profile and “a consistent failure to include data that would be favorable to Mrs. Hey,”including 17 computer-generated scores on the Parental Stress Index that were all in the normal range.
This was a significant omission, given that Judge Almand cited Hey’s tendency of “freezing...in times of stress” as one of the main reasons she could not be trusted to raise her own child.
Hey – who has never been convicted of either abuse or neglect – has had no contact with three-year-old Sabrina since Judge Almand allowed her to be adopted by the same foster family Arlington CPS workers originally selected to care for her baby.
Barbara F. Hollingsworth is The Examiner’s local opinion editor. "
"Children being taken from their homes, based on tips from anonymous telephone callers alleging abuse or neglect, has been cast in a harsh spotlight in the Texas polygamy case, and there’s growing evidence that more than a few of the 510,000 children placed in foster care annually don’t belong there.
In February, Georgia state Sen. Nancy Schaefer released a blistering assessment of the bureaucrats entrusted to protect children there: “I believe Child Protective Services (CPS) nationwide has become corrupt and that the entire system is broken almost beyond repair. I am convinced parents and families should be warned of the dangers.”
Armed with court orders and protected by confidentiality statutes that function as bureaucratic shield laws, CPS workers need just one anonymous phone call to a hotline to swoop in and remove children, regardless of the facts.
Such calls can be legitimate, coming from a legally mandated reporter such as a doctor or teacher. But it could also be a fabrication from a vindictive ex-spouse, a nosy neighbor, or a disgruntled relative.
Since no laws clearly define child abuse and neglect, parents have been accused of these serious crimes when what they actually did was yell, withhold TV privileges, or “repressing” their children by supervising them too much.
Dr. Steven Krason, professor of political science and legal studies at Franciscan University of Steubenville, is writing a book on CPS wrongdoing based on two decades of research.
Krason says CPS itself now poses “a grave threat” because “it is almost impossible to fully insulate one’s family from...a system that on very little pretense can simply reach into the home and take away one’s offspring.”
He’s convinced the number of real child abuse cases has remained fairly steady over the last three decades; what has been growing is an unprecedented government assault on innocent parents.
And if it doesn’t take much to have your children placed in foster care, getting them back can be another story. An anonymous call about a 10-ounce weight loss by their then 3-week-old daughter triggered a legal avalanche that buried Arlington residents Nancy Hey and Christopher Slitor.
Their parental rights were terminated last year by Arlington Judge James Almand even though Hey and Slitor had been exonerated by of all neglect charges nine months earlier.
In another local case, Georgetown residents Greg and Juliana Caplan had to spend $75,000 on lawyers and wait two weeks before their children were returned, even after five doctors confirmed that an injury sustained by one of their twin daughters was not caused by abuse.
The Caplans are still listed as possible child abusers in D.C., however, because they refused to submit to psychological counseling. Despite the stigma, that might have been a wise decision.
The psychological evaluation trap is one of the least expected obstacles facing parents snared unfairly in the CPS system. Most panicked parents promise to do anything to get their children back, often agreeing to a battery of psychological tests they naively believe will prove their parental competence and end the nightmare. But it doesn’t always work out that way.
Arlington social workers told Hey that she had to undergo psychological testing before she could get her baby back, so the longtime Federal Communications Commission employee readily agreed.
She was diagnosed with two clinical disorders by Dr. Giselle Hass at the Multicultural Clinical Center in Springfield. This psychological evaluation was cited in the court ruling terminating Hey’s parental rights.
But an independent, expert analysis of the report obtained by The Examiner included scathing critique of the methodology used to evaluate Hey, saying it “...reads more like advocacy than a professional psychological assessment... clear and frequent evidence of error... Any graduate student who turned in as poorly scored and interpreted a test as did this evaluator would probably have failed the first semester.”
Besides violations of standard practice and professional rules of ethics, the analysis noted numerous illustrations of bias in the psychological profile and “a consistent failure to include data that would be favorable to Mrs. Hey,”including 17 computer-generated scores on the Parental Stress Index that were all in the normal range.
This was a significant omission, given that Judge Almand cited Hey’s tendency of “freezing...in times of stress” as one of the main reasons she could not be trusted to raise her own child.
Hey – who has never been convicted of either abuse or neglect – has had no contact with three-year-old Sabrina since Judge Almand allowed her to be adopted by the same foster family Arlington CPS workers originally selected to care for her baby.
Barbara F. Hollingsworth is The Examiner’s local opinion editor. "
Sunday, October 18, 2009
Beliefs, Opinions,Morality & Mentality are in the 1600 in Barton County Missouri
Well it would appear that that like their beliefs, opinions, morality and mentality at the Barton County Missouri Court House.There transportation in the 1600’s as well!!!!
Come on get with the times people!!!!!!
Come on get with the times people!!!!!!
Saturday, October 17, 2009
This Video Confronts If CPS/DFS Hates Kids
The answer is NO they do not hate them they love them like a tapeworm loves its host. The problem is they do not care about them there is a difference, you would think that a child dieing in custody is a bad thing, but not to a system funded on a trickle effect. To a State economy a dead kid is just as lucrative as a live one, an abused kid in foster care is better than one at home with there parents safe and sound.
WHY? Think about it, the State receives funds when the child goes in to care. From there they can tap the piggy bank for numerous other things treatment, drugs, evaluation etc. Now if the child GETS abused in foster care, there again are evaluations, drugs, etc as well now possible criminal charges for the abuser.
Then there’s a death, just as good as the above, because now there is coroners inquests, charges, extra hours for law enforcement, the division, etc. And don’t forget the news crews! NEWS CREWS! You say.. Well that’s a bad thing, isn’t it all that publicity.. No that’s the best, then your politician can use it to catapult themselves, they can lobby for more funds to correct there systems. And all those news crews bring revenue with them, to the dinners, coffee shops etc. in the form of taxes. On top of that, it sells news papers and TV ads. With Missouri eliminating income tax and going to a point of sale tax, should aid in generating funds for the State.
So this video address CPS/DFS love or hate for children, and I say they LOVE them to DEATH!!!!
WHY? Think about it, the State receives funds when the child goes in to care. From there they can tap the piggy bank for numerous other things treatment, drugs, evaluation etc. Now if the child GETS abused in foster care, there again are evaluations, drugs, etc as well now possible criminal charges for the abuser.
Then there’s a death, just as good as the above, because now there is coroners inquests, charges, extra hours for law enforcement, the division, etc. And don’t forget the news crews! NEWS CREWS! You say.. Well that’s a bad thing, isn’t it all that publicity.. No that’s the best, then your politician can use it to catapult themselves, they can lobby for more funds to correct there systems. And all those news crews bring revenue with them, to the dinners, coffee shops etc. in the form of taxes. On top of that, it sells news papers and TV ads. With Missouri eliminating income tax and going to a point of sale tax, should aid in generating funds for the State.
So this video address CPS/DFS love or hate for children, and I say they LOVE them to DEATH!!!!
Friday, October 16, 2009
Organization is the nail in your coffin and we are the hammer!
Very interesting video and a very sad one, but a MUST SEE to understand the monster that the Social Service system is. This woman gave up because they beat her into submission, we will tell you this you Sons of Bitches!!! You will NOT beat us down, we will fight you everyday, expose you everyday and pick up the fight for people like this. You have all leaped in to a political nightmare, against a force you should not have reckoned with and we see stories like this similar to what we are living only outrages us more.
The problem is all these sad sob stories on the net all these people with a story to tell but no outlet and most important organization.
And organization is the nail in your coffin and we are the hammer. We can organize, we are not shy and we do not fear conflict or the media, not like you and your careers. So set back and enjoy the ride, watch as one by one people across the land people join hands in a common goal and march on congress by phone by fax and in person to stop the puppy mill the States have created and stall your federal funds.
The way to change DFS/CPS and hold a State at the publics mercy, is to seize the purse!
The problem is all these sad sob stories on the net all these people with a story to tell but no outlet and most important organization.
And organization is the nail in your coffin and we are the hammer. We can organize, we are not shy and we do not fear conflict or the media, not like you and your careers. So set back and enjoy the ride, watch as one by one people across the land people join hands in a common goal and march on congress by phone by fax and in person to stop the puppy mill the States have created and stall your federal funds.
The way to change DFS/CPS and hold a State at the publics mercy, is to seize the purse!
ALL these kids died not by there parents but where the States placed them, WAY 2 GO DFS/CPS
ALL these kids died not by there parents or some predator but where the States placed them, in care WAY 2 GO DFS/CPS This is a national issue the reality is children removed from a home for PROFIT will end up dead, abused raped etc. Time to STOP, the puppy mill.
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
CPS/DFS Are FULL of VERY underhanded people, see for yourself.
Well we have stated that CPS/DFS are full of some VERY underhanded people. Well judge for your self in this short clip we FOUND and had nothing to due with it creation
Monday, October 12, 2009
2nd Time By The State of Missouri is Reckless Incompetence, As A Hot Line Caller Your Identity is NOT Protected!
This is the second time that the State of Missouri has released the identity of a hotline caller it the States Narrative Report, as in this document that has been edited an only pertinent information displayed. It clearly states that in 1995 Janie Thomas placed a Hot Line call to Missouri DFS. Again a criminal act for the State of Missouri to release this information, but they have done so. Governor Nixon, Lt. Governor Kinder, Social Services Director Ron Levy as well other parties have been contact in-regards to this and we are awaiting there response.
Something for the public to ponder, you are information and identity is NOT confidential, nor is what you say in the call, as was removed from this document. Keep that in mind when you pick up the phone to make a false or legitimate report of abuse/neglect that you yourself may be held accountable for your actions.
Something for the public to ponder, you are information and identity is NOT confidential, nor is what you say in the call, as was removed from this document. Keep that in mind when you pick up the phone to make a false or legitimate report of abuse/neglect that you yourself may be held accountable for your actions.
Before You Hotline A Call Know Your Identity Is NOT Confidential In Missouri
Even though Missouri Law mandates that a party making a Hotline Call to the State shall be kept confidential, it is obviously NOT as obtained in this document from the 5th Circuit Missouri Children’s Division as it CLEARLY States in there records that Mrs. Cheryl Fountain was the Hotline Caller. It is mandatory this information is removed and was not and is a crime that it was not. Well maybe just a simple error but the 28th Circuit Children’s Division released the same information. And the 5th Circuit released another parties name, that we have documentation of that she made a previous Hot Line call. That will be presented in a separate story.
So the next time you go to pick up the phone to report Child Abuse whether legitimate or false, take in to consideration that your identity WILL be released to the accused/alleged perpetrator and that you are not protected and could face civil ramifications for your actions.
And for the State of Missouri to promise this protection to its citizens and then not follow through shows the reckless disregard by the executive branch and its legislature. As Governor Jay Nixon, Lt. Governor Peter Kinder Department of Social Services Director Ronald Levy have all been contacted in-regards to this, and no response at this time.
So the next time you go to pick up the phone to report Child Abuse whether legitimate or false, take in to consideration that your identity WILL be released to the accused/alleged perpetrator and that you are not protected and could face civil ramifications for your actions.
And for the State of Missouri to promise this protection to its citizens and then not follow through shows the reckless disregard by the executive branch and its legislature. As Governor Jay Nixon, Lt. Governor Peter Kinder Department of Social Services Director Ronald Levy have all been contacted in-regards to this, and no response at this time.
Sunday, October 11, 2009
Missouri House Rep. Cynthia Davis Dont Give A SHIT About MO. Kids
Very sad Ms. Davis is the CHAIR on Special Standing Committee on Children and Families, in Missouri and her views are such as this. Of course if she doesn’t care enough to feed poverty stricken children then why would she give a shit that four children’s whose lives and well being are in danger. Perfect example of a person filling a political seat and board position, that has NO compassion for what they do other than to get fatter of tax payer funds. And O’ looky who shares a seat with her on the same committee Jeff Grisamore, who only represents Lee Summit & Ed Emery who was our House Rep. that has been contacted numerous times and failed to respond. So on a committee of twelve (12) Missouri House Reps. We have three for sure that do not give a SHIT about Missouri Children or there well being. Seriously the voters of Missouri need to seriously re-think there choices when voting. As it is obvious that a large number of members in the Missouri House & Senate as well the Executive branch have for gotten they are there to serve the people ALL the people.
Saturday, October 10, 2009
I’m Innocent No Need To Worry
Sure, bet you believe in Santa an Unicorns as well. Don’t fall victim to that way of thinking. You are in for a fight from day one, the entire Social Service System/Children’s Division of Missouri an other areas as well is to puppy mill kids. It rakes in MILLIONS & MILLIONS each year. Not just for the Children’s Division/ The State, but for Doctors who do exams, layers to prosecute and defend, the courts to receive transcripts filing fees etc. and counselors. It is quite an industrial racket, and who regulates it why your House & Senate, they are who give the Division the laws they use to do these thing and always slant the system in the favor of the division and against the parent/perpetrator because it makes them look good, it creates jobs revenue and they can beat there chest at election time and say how they did such a good job protecting the children.
So oh well, I go in front of a Judge to tell my story and its all over, I’m Innocent! Wrong again the Judge your going in front of is employed by the county the same county that receives CASH each month to have your child in the “system” it is this same robe wearing, gavel wheeling, hypocrite that knows nothing about you except what they are being told by a GROUP of people who don’t know you as well. But you can bet your ass they know each other.
Our case for example the Judge on the case Charles Curless of Barton County Missouri, was stupid enough to write in his order how he and the other parties discussed the petition prior to being filed. Naughty Naughty, of course complaints were filed and nothing done, he was recently appointed Board of Governors of The Missouri Bar, even with the Governor, Missouri Bar and The Commission on Retirement, Removal and Discipline of Judges knowing full well the inside workings of the case, its know wonder now why the complaints were ignored and swept under the rug. Money producers get promotions, its only good employer/employee relations.
That Judge in front of you will solely decided yours and your children’s fate there is no Jury Trial as there should be. You and your lawyer will be at a disadvantage as it will most likely be stacked 4 lawyers to your 1.
They will use laws like RSMO 210.150 to keep there file from you, so you can not prepare. They will leave the investigation open past there mandated deadline to keep you from retrieving the file as well. And why because the systems purpose is to beat you, to use your children to benefit them and cash flow in to the State. And that noble Judge is on that payroll.
So oh well, I go in front of a Judge to tell my story and its all over, I’m Innocent! Wrong again the Judge your going in front of is employed by the county the same county that receives CASH each month to have your child in the “system” it is this same robe wearing, gavel wheeling, hypocrite that knows nothing about you except what they are being told by a GROUP of people who don’t know you as well. But you can bet your ass they know each other.
Our case for example the Judge on the case Charles Curless of Barton County Missouri, was stupid enough to write in his order how he and the other parties discussed the petition prior to being filed. Naughty Naughty, of course complaints were filed and nothing done, he was recently appointed Board of Governors of The Missouri Bar, even with the Governor, Missouri Bar and The Commission on Retirement, Removal and Discipline of Judges knowing full well the inside workings of the case, its know wonder now why the complaints were ignored and swept under the rug. Money producers get promotions, its only good employer/employee relations.
That Judge in front of you will solely decided yours and your children’s fate there is no Jury Trial as there should be. You and your lawyer will be at a disadvantage as it will most likely be stacked 4 lawyers to your 1.
They will use laws like RSMO 210.150 to keep there file from you, so you can not prepare. They will leave the investigation open past there mandated deadline to keep you from retrieving the file as well. And why because the systems purpose is to beat you, to use your children to benefit them and cash flow in to the State. And that noble Judge is on that payroll.
Child Protective Services Is At The Door What Do You DO?
This video is in regards to California’s Children’s Services, but the advice and tactics can be utilized in about any State. She is VERY correct when she says that the workers can not be trusted, they will lie falsify documents and do what ever needs to be done to start collecting that bounty on your children.
There are VERY FEW legitimate social worker and they usually don’t last long because they want to follow policy while there co-workers and supervisors influence them to break them.
There are VERY FEW legitimate social worker and they usually don’t last long because they want to follow policy while there co-workers and supervisors influence them to break them.
Letter Sent to Missouri House Rep. Jeff Grisamore & Parties
October 05, 2009
Jeff Grisamore
201 West Capitol Avenue
Room 134
Jefferson City MO 65101
Dear Mr. Grisamore;
We received a message from your office stating that you only represent the people of Lee Summit, we are sure the people of Greenwood will find that of interest. As for you only representing those areas is incorrect as you are a member of the Missouri House of Representatives and your votes on bills etc., affect the entire State you also are on the Appropriations Committee for Mental Health & Social Services as well Special Standing on Committees on Children & Families. As well we would note you are either sponsoring or co-sponsoring a number of bills that are relevant to our situation and therefore, it is our right to voice our opinion and views to our entire State government and we will continue to do so. As for us not being a resident of the State of Missouri, Mr. C***** was for 36 years who also served as a Law Enforcement Officer protecting the public, the State body of government and has more than demonstrated his allegiance to the State. Mrs. C***** was a resident 22 years until we were ran from our home by threats of violence by a Sheriffs Deputy and two MSHP Troopers, as well having our home entered numerous times and our privacy invaded. For you to lay claim that because we are NOW in Arkansas the government body owes no-allegiance, is ludicrous & infantile. Furthermore, we still have a connection to the State as we own land a property there as well our children are being held there, and we have employees still working there.
We will continue to serve notice upon all parties involved both in the legislative branch, executive branch, and at County level, honestly if you believe that you trying to hinder our rights to free speech, right to protest peaceably and right to representation are having a affect the Lt. Governor’s Offices already attempted to silence us with no avail. And for your office to whine about use of tax payer’s money we in the time we lived there paid our taxes and as such we expect representation. Perhaps if you’re not up to that task you should consider, not re-running come election or resigning now. Because if you believe for an instant the information we are bringing to light is not occurring in your own district you are mistaken, and you claim to be a humanitarian caring for orphans, widows, and the poor. Who do you think the Division primarily feeds on collecting state and federal funding and the tax payer’s dollars, the rich? But like so many politicians kissing babies on Election Day turning their back the rest of the time. You apparently are the perfect bureaucrat, congratulations!
Sincerely,
Mr. & Mrs. C*****
P.O. Box ***
********, Ar *****
Fax (***) ***-****
Phone (***) ***-****
CC:
Governor Jay Nixon
Lt Governor Kinder
Eric Bernstein
Davis, Cynthia
Ervin, Doug
Cooper, Robert
Corcoran, Michael
Emery, Edgar
McDonald, Tom
McGhee, Michael
McNeil, Margo
Sander, Therese
Schupp, Jill
Webb, Steve
Sater, David
Weter, Raymond
Atkins, Bert
Cooper, Robert
Curls, Shalonn
Jones, Tishaura
Kirkton, Jeanne
McClanahan, Rebecca
Schaaf, Robert
Schad, Rodney
Zerr, Anne
_____________________________________________
AUTHORS COMMENTS:
This letter was faxed to House Rep. Grisamore to address the issues of his office and there statement, he has yet to respond! As for the others CCed in the document Mr. Bernstein is the families attorney all other parties are members of Missouri State Government they were ALL faxed copies of the letter as they are either on the executive branch or sit on a board along with Mr. Grisamore, out of all of them notified we had ZERO (0) respond!
Very sad, that the governmental body would act in this manor and goes to show there, disregard for matters at hand. Even sadder is the fact Ed Emery was and technical is our House Rep. but he does not like pornography in Southwest Missouri, odd how politics work when he stood on our porch and pleaded for our vote, he had no problem with our lifestyle or the fact we were porn producers.
Jeff Grisamore
201 West Capitol Avenue
Room 134
Jefferson City MO 65101
Dear Mr. Grisamore;
We received a message from your office stating that you only represent the people of Lee Summit, we are sure the people of Greenwood will find that of interest. As for you only representing those areas is incorrect as you are a member of the Missouri House of Representatives and your votes on bills etc., affect the entire State you also are on the Appropriations Committee for Mental Health & Social Services as well Special Standing on Committees on Children & Families. As well we would note you are either sponsoring or co-sponsoring a number of bills that are relevant to our situation and therefore, it is our right to voice our opinion and views to our entire State government and we will continue to do so. As for us not being a resident of the State of Missouri, Mr. C***** was for 36 years who also served as a Law Enforcement Officer protecting the public, the State body of government and has more than demonstrated his allegiance to the State. Mrs. C***** was a resident 22 years until we were ran from our home by threats of violence by a Sheriffs Deputy and two MSHP Troopers, as well having our home entered numerous times and our privacy invaded. For you to lay claim that because we are NOW in Arkansas the government body owes no-allegiance, is ludicrous & infantile. Furthermore, we still have a connection to the State as we own land a property there as well our children are being held there, and we have employees still working there.
We will continue to serve notice upon all parties involved both in the legislative branch, executive branch, and at County level, honestly if you believe that you trying to hinder our rights to free speech, right to protest peaceably and right to representation are having a affect the Lt. Governor’s Offices already attempted to silence us with no avail. And for your office to whine about use of tax payer’s money we in the time we lived there paid our taxes and as such we expect representation. Perhaps if you’re not up to that task you should consider, not re-running come election or resigning now. Because if you believe for an instant the information we are bringing to light is not occurring in your own district you are mistaken, and you claim to be a humanitarian caring for orphans, widows, and the poor. Who do you think the Division primarily feeds on collecting state and federal funding and the tax payer’s dollars, the rich? But like so many politicians kissing babies on Election Day turning their back the rest of the time. You apparently are the perfect bureaucrat, congratulations!
Sincerely,
Mr. & Mrs. C*****
P.O. Box ***
********, Ar *****
Fax (***) ***-****
Phone (***) ***-****
CC:
Governor Jay Nixon
Lt Governor Kinder
Eric Bernstein
Davis, Cynthia
Ervin, Doug
Cooper, Robert
Corcoran, Michael
Emery, Edgar
McDonald, Tom
McGhee, Michael
McNeil, Margo
Sander, Therese
Schupp, Jill
Webb, Steve
Sater, David
Weter, Raymond
Atkins, Bert
Cooper, Robert
Curls, Shalonn
Jones, Tishaura
Kirkton, Jeanne
McClanahan, Rebecca
Schaaf, Robert
Schad, Rodney
Zerr, Anne
_____________________________________________
AUTHORS COMMENTS:
This letter was faxed to House Rep. Grisamore to address the issues of his office and there statement, he has yet to respond! As for the others CCed in the document Mr. Bernstein is the families attorney all other parties are members of Missouri State Government they were ALL faxed copies of the letter as they are either on the executive branch or sit on a board along with Mr. Grisamore, out of all of them notified we had ZERO (0) respond!
Very sad, that the governmental body would act in this manor and goes to show there, disregard for matters at hand. Even sadder is the fact Ed Emery was and technical is our House Rep. but he does not like pornography in Southwest Missouri, odd how politics work when he stood on our porch and pleaded for our vote, he had no problem with our lifestyle or the fact we were porn producers.
Letter Wrote To Belinda (Kaderly) Elliston After Her Rant
September 23, 2008
Belinda Elliston
1601 South Madison Street
Webb City, Mo 64870
Dear Ms. Elliston,
I noticed during your questioning and closing statements in the hearing of Tristan ******on September 22, 2008. I could not help but notice how you put both my bedroom on trial as well as my life style. I would encourage you to read Lawrence vs. Texas .
I do understand in the way that you persecuted and attacked my lifestyle that you yourself could be crying out do to sexual repression. I understand that living in a closed minded community located in Barton County, Southwest Missouri it can be very confining and restrictive, as well as, morally challenging where the highlight in the area is fornicating with farm animals and incest.
Perhaps I can provide you with possibly some books or literature maybe a help group to discuss and help you deal with your own repression or miss understandings of others life styles. To make you better versed in serving the community in your formal capacity, as well as aiding you in your personal life as you deal with others in the community. This is my attempt to offer you the use of services to aid you in your career to better serve the public.
Please feel free to contact me in regards to this.
Sincerely,
Mr. ******
____________________________________________
AUTHORS COMMENTS:
Needless to say she did not request the information, or address that she may be sexually repressed. But she did furnish this personal letter to her to the court as “evidence”. Which then opened it to a public document for review by the public, and not personal correspondence. Like a puppet on a string, jerk jerk jerk!
Belinda Elliston
1601 South Madison Street
Webb City, Mo 64870
Dear Ms. Elliston,
I noticed during your questioning and closing statements in the hearing of Tristan ******on September 22, 2008. I could not help but notice how you put both my bedroom on trial as well as my life style. I would encourage you to read Lawrence vs. Texas .
I do understand in the way that you persecuted and attacked my lifestyle that you yourself could be crying out do to sexual repression. I understand that living in a closed minded community located in Barton County, Southwest Missouri it can be very confining and restrictive, as well as, morally challenging where the highlight in the area is fornicating with farm animals and incest.
Perhaps I can provide you with possibly some books or literature maybe a help group to discuss and help you deal with your own repression or miss understandings of others life styles. To make you better versed in serving the community in your formal capacity, as well as aiding you in your personal life as you deal with others in the community. This is my attempt to offer you the use of services to aid you in your career to better serve the public.
Please feel free to contact me in regards to this.
Sincerely,
Mr. ******
____________________________________________
AUTHORS COMMENTS:
Needless to say she did not request the information, or address that she may be sexually repressed. But she did furnish this personal letter to her to the court as “evidence”. Which then opened it to a public document for review by the public, and not personal correspondence. Like a puppet on a string, jerk jerk jerk!
Friday, October 9, 2009
Welcome To ChildThief News
Greetings and welcome to the newest weapon in our arsenal to fight the political corruption in the State of Missouri as well the bloodsucking parasite on family values known as the Missouri Children’s Division. This blog as well as our other informative and fun sites will bring to view in the public eye the misuses of power and authority as well misuse of State & Federal funds be condoned by the Missouri Government and those under it. And well draw attention and prove that no person is immune to the tyranny of State intervention. More to come very soon, please be sure to bookmark us.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
