Showing posts with label child abuse. Show all posts
Showing posts with label child abuse. Show all posts

Monday, December 14, 2009

Holiday Season!

Well the Holiday Season is upon us and Christmas is just a few days away, hope everyone has all there shopping done and stockings are hung by the chimney with care. Because the Grinch is near.
Because apparently according to the Missouri Children’s Division and Mr. David Capps if you do not celebrate the Christian holiday and buy massive amounts of expensive gifts for your children it is abuse/neglect.
Mr. Capps documented in his reports that we did not get the children any gifts for the last Christmas that they were with us. So apparently there is no separation between church and State first off.
But what should be of a greater concern to you, is the fact we did by presents for our children, totaling in the realm of $5800.00 that is not a typo! These gifts included a dirt bike, full riding gear, Play Station 3, tons of games and the list goes on. So if they are going to state that gifts totaling that amount are not a meaningful Christmas. We do feel sorry for the less fortunate the unemployed and those who do not celebrate Christmas because who knows that may not be Santa coming down the chimney it may be the Division. We would be VERY curious what Mr. Capps spent on his children for Christmas on his Social Workers Salary!!! Happy Holidays to all!

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

A VERY Enlightening article wrote by, Barbra Hollingsworth of the Examiner

Is it child protection or legal kidnapping?

"Children being taken from their homes, based on tips from anonymous telephone callers alleging abuse or neglect, has been cast in a harsh spotlight in the Texas polygamy case, and there’s growing evidence that more than a few of the 510,000 children placed in foster care annually don’t belong there.
In February,
Georgia state Sen. Nancy Schaefer released a blistering assessment of the bureaucrats entrusted to protect children there: “I believe Child Protective Services (CPS) nationwide has become corrupt and that the entire system is broken almost beyond repair. I am convinced parents and families should be warned of the dangers.”
Armed with court orders and protected by confidentiality statutes that function as bureaucratic shield laws, CPS workers need just one anonymous phone call to a hotline to swoop in and remove children, regardless of the facts.
Such calls can be legitimate, coming from a legally mandated reporter such as a doctor or teacher. But it could also be a fabrication from a vindictive ex-spouse, a nosy neighbor, or a disgruntled relative.
Since no laws clearly define child abuse and neglect, parents have been accused of these serious crimes when what they actually did was yell, withhold TV privileges, or “repressing” their children by supervising them too much.
Dr. Steven Krason, professor of political science and legal studies at Franciscan University of Steubenville, is writing a book on CPS wrongdoing based on two decades of research.
Krason says CPS itself now poses “a grave threat” because “it is almost impossible to fully insulate one’s family from...a system that on very little pretense can simply reach into the home and take away one’s offspring.”
He’s convinced the number of real child abuse cases has remained fairly steady over the last three decades; what has been growing is an unprecedented government assault on innocent parents.
And if it doesn’t take much to have your children placed in foster care, getting them back can be another story. An anonymous call about a 10-ounce weight loss by their then 3-week-old daughter triggered a legal avalanche that buried
Arlington residents Nancy Hey and Christopher Slitor.
Their parental rights were terminated last year by
Arlington Judge James Almand even though Hey and Slitor had been exonerated by of all neglect charges nine months earlier.
In another local case,
Georgetown residents Greg and Juliana Caplan had to spend $75,000 on lawyers and wait two weeks before their children were returned, even after five doctors confirmed that an injury sustained by one of their twin daughters was not caused by abuse.
The Caplans are still listed as possible child abusers in D.C., however, because they refused to submit to psychological counseling. Despite the stigma, that might have been a wise decision.
The psychological evaluation trap is one of the least expected obstacles facing parents snared unfairly in the CPS system. Most panicked parents promise to do anything to get their children back, often agreeing to a battery of psychological tests they naively believe will prove their parental competence and end the nightmare. But it doesn’t always work out that way.
Arlington social workers told Hey that she had to undergo psychological testing before she could get her baby back, so the longtime
Federal Communications Commission employee readily agreed.
She was diagnosed with two clinical disorders by
Dr. Giselle Hass at the Multicultural Clinical Center in Springfield. This psychological evaluation was cited in the court ruling terminating Hey’s parental rights.
But an independent, expert analysis of the report obtained by The Examiner included scathing critique of the methodology used to evaluate Hey, saying it “...reads more like advocacy than a professional psychological assessment... clear and frequent evidence of error... Any graduate student who turned in as poorly scored and interpreted a test as did this evaluator would probably have failed the first semester.”
Besides violations of standard practice and professional rules of ethics, the analysis noted numerous illustrations of bias in the psychological profile and “a consistent failure to include data that would be favorable to Mrs. Hey,”including 17 computer-generated scores on the Parental Stress Index that were all in the normal range.
This was a significant omission, given that Judge Almand cited Hey’s tendency of “freezing...in times of stress” as one of the main reasons she could not be trusted to raise her own child.
Hey – who has never been convicted of either abuse or neglect – has had no contact with three-year-old Sabrina since Judge Almand allowed her to be adopted by the same foster family Arlington CPS workers originally selected to care for her baby.

Barbara F. Hollingsworth is The Examiner’s local opinion editor. "

Friday, October 16, 2009

Organization is the nail in your coffin and we are the hammer!

Very interesting video and a very sad one, but a MUST SEE to understand the monster that the Social Service system is. This woman gave up because they beat her into submission, we will tell you this you Sons of Bitches!!! You will NOT beat us down, we will fight you everyday, expose you everyday and pick up the fight for people like this. You have all leaped in to a political nightmare, against a force you should not have reckoned with and we see stories like this similar to what we are living only outrages us more.
The problem is all these sad sob stories on the net all these people with a story to tell but no outlet and most important organization.
And organization is the nail in your coffin and we are the hammer. We can organize, we are not shy and we do not fear conflict or the media, not like you and your careers. So set back and enjoy the ride, watch as one by one people across the land people join hands in a common goal and march on congress by phone by fax and in person to stop the puppy mill the States have created and stall your federal funds.
The way to change DFS/CPS and hold a State at the publics mercy, is to seize the purse!


ALL these kids died not by there parents but where the States placed them, WAY 2 GO DFS/CPS

ALL these kids died not by there parents or some predator but where the States placed them, in care WAY 2 GO DFS/CPS This is a national issue the reality is children removed from a home for PROFIT will end up dead, abused raped etc. Time to STOP, the puppy mill.

Saturday, October 10, 2009

I’m Innocent No Need To Worry

Sure, bet you believe in Santa an Unicorns as well. Don’t fall victim to that way of thinking. You are in for a fight from day one, the entire Social Service System/Children’s Division of Missouri an other areas as well is to puppy mill kids. It rakes in MILLIONS & MILLIONS each year. Not just for the Children’s Division/ The State, but for Doctors who do exams, layers to prosecute and defend, the courts to receive transcripts filing fees etc. and counselors. It is quite an industrial racket, and who regulates it why your House & Senate, they are who give the Division the laws they use to do these thing and always slant the system in the favor of the division and against the parent/perpetrator because it makes them look good, it creates jobs revenue and they can beat there chest at election time and say how they did such a good job protecting the children.
So oh well, I go in front of a Judge to tell my story and its all over, I’m Innocent! Wrong again the Judge your going in front of is employed by the county the same county that receives CASH each month to have your child in the “system” it is this same robe wearing, gavel wheeling, hypocrite that knows nothing about you except what they are being told by a GROUP of people who don’t know you as well. But you can bet your ass they know each other.
Our case for example the Judge on the case Charles Curless of Barton County Missouri, was stupid enough to write in his order how he and the other parties discussed the petition prior to being filed. Naughty Naughty, of course complaints were filed and nothing done, he was recently appointed Board of Governors of The Missouri Bar, even with the Governor, Missouri Bar and The Commission on Retirement, Removal and Discipline of Judges knowing full well the inside workings of the case, its know wonder now why the complaints were ignored and swept under the rug. Money producers get promotions, its only good employer/employee relations.
That Judge in front of you will solely decided yours and your children’s fate there is no Jury Trial as there should be. You and your lawyer will be at a disadvantage as it will most likely be stacked 4 lawyers to your 1.
They will use laws like RSMO 210.150 to keep there file from you, so you can not prepare. They will leave the investigation open past there mandated deadline to keep you from retrieving the file as well. And why because the systems purpose is to beat you, to use your children to benefit them and cash flow in to the State. And that noble Judge is on that payroll.

Child Protective Services Is At The Door What Do You DO?

This video is in regards to California’s Children’s Services, but the advice and tactics can be utilized in about any State. She is VERY correct when she says that the workers can not be trusted, they will lie falsify documents and do what ever needs to be done to start collecting that bounty on your children.
There are VERY FEW legitimate social worker and they usually don’t last long because they want to follow policy while there co-workers and supervisors influence them to break them.